Democracy in plural societies yale university press. Political scientists define a consociational state as one which has major internal divisions along ethnic, religious, or linguistic lines, with none of the divisions large enough to form a majority group, but which remains stable due to. Consociational democracy, arend lijphart, grand coalition, mutual veto, pro. My focus is explicitly on consensus democracy as an ideal type and its ascribed effects. Arend lijphart is known for his works on comparative methods,1 electoral systems,2 and nonmajoritarian or powersharing democracy. Consociational democracy can be defined in terms of four characteristics. Renewed scholarly interest in democracy in divided societies in general and consociationalism in particular coincides with the wave of power. His field of specialisation is comparative politics. Democracy in plural societies, he listed nine conditions conducive to consociational democracy. Consociational democracy world politics cambridge core. Also, the theoretical chapter deals with some critics of lijphart, like donald horowitz. Consociationalism is a form of democracy which seeks to regulate the sharing of power in a state that comprises diverse societies distinct ethnic, religious, political, national or linguistic groups, by allocating these groups collective rights.
The first and most important element is government by a grand coalition of the political. Consociational democracy in deeply divided society. Abstract consociational theory challenges the two paradigmatic notions that democracy should be equated with majority rule and that democracy is not a viable form of government in deeply divided societies. Democracy in plural societies by arend lijphart yale. Consociational democracy presupposes not only a willingness on the part of elites to cooperate but also a capability to solve the political problems of their countries. This willwritten work, containing a wealth of information on politics of many diverse nations is highly recommended for academic libraries.
Patterns of democracy and its critics nilschristian bormann. May 26, 2008 arend lijphart is best known for his theory of consociational or power sharing democracy, which enables the peaceful governance of deeply divided societies. Trustees of princeton university university of pennsylvania. Consociationalism has been an influential theory on the academic study of the northern ireland peace process. Moreover, consociationalism is the more suitable prescription for very deeply divided societies.
Lijphart presents his arguments in favor of consociational democracy. Consociational democracy, world politics, january 1969 3. Lijphart 1977 explained different elements between majoritarian democracy and consensusconsociational democracy as well as emphasized the latter as a solution for conflict in states where traditional majoritarian democracy might not work due to deep rooted ethnic, linguistic, or religious cleavages. Thus, switzerland has been characterized as a consociational democracy since 1943, belgium after world war i, austria from 1945 to 1966, and the netherlands from 1917 to 1967. Arend lijphart research professor of political science, university of california, san diego pages 144150. For the second part of the theoretical framework, i will introduce more focused. The writings of theorists and practitioners, classical and modern, boston, allyn and.
This is a thorough, technical and theoretical exploration of what lijphart terms consociational democracy as a form of democracy suited to plural societies. Pdf abstract consociational democracy as the goal and a tool in mitigating consociational democracy, arend lijphart, grand coalition, mutual veto, pro. In his 1968 book, the politics of accommodation, lijphart cited clas. Shugart, and bernard grofman, new haven, yale university press, 2014. Thinking about democracy draws on a lifetimes experience of research and publication in this area and collects together for the first time his most significant and. The alternative to majoritarian democracy is consociational democracy. Consociational democracy volume 21 issue 2 arend lijphart.
While democracy has conquered more and more places in the world, there is still. On the development of the concept of consociational. The bestresearched book on democracy in the world today. Consociationalism in theory and practice springerlink. Angloamerican political systems exemplified by britain and the united states, continental european political systems france, germany, and italy. Arend lijpharts most popular book is patterns of democracy. View consociational democracy research papers on academia. Jul 06, 2017 lijphart 1977 explained different elements between majoritarian democracy and consensus consociational democracy as well as emphasized the latter as a solution for conflict in states where traditional majoritarian democracy might not work due to deep rooted ethnic, linguistic, or religious cleavages. Yale university press, 1977 political science 248 pages. Abstract consociational democracy as the goal and a tool in mitigating conflict in the third world has been frequently used during the last decades, especially in subsaharan africa. Welcome,you are looking at books for reading, the patterns of democracy, you will able to read or download in pdf or epub books and notice some of author may have lock the live reading for some of country. According to the theory of crosscutting cleavages, one would expect the low countries, switzerland, and austria, with subcultures divided from each other by mutually reinforcing cleavages, to exhibit great immobilism and instability.
Therefore it need a free signup process to obtain the book. Arend lijphart s 1969 article on consociational democracy was a compelling critique of prevailing theories of democratic stability and the launching pad for one of the most widely regarded. A methodological note on the comparative study of political systems, world politics, 19 october 1966, p. While it may be difficult to achieve and maintain stable democratic governments in countries with deep religious, ideological, linguistic, cultural, or ethnic cleavages, lijphart argues that it is not at all impossible. View notes lijphart from poli 212 at mcgill university. A look at the failure of peace in burundi through the lens of arend lijpharts theory of consociational democracy, journal of modern african studies, vol. See lijphart, powersharing in south africa, policy papers in international affairs, no. Consequently, a third favorable factor to interelite cooperation is a relatively low total load on the decisionmaking apparatus. Examining thirtysix democracies during the period from 1945 to 2010, lijphart arrives at importantand unexpectedconclusions about what type of democracy works best. He has an amazing grasp of the relevant literature, and hes compiled an unmatched collection of data. Lijphart democratic political systems types cases causes. International journal of peace studies, volume 14, number 2, autumnwinter 2009.
University of california, institute of international studies, 1985, 114. Nov 30, 2007 arend lijphart is one of the world s leading and most influential political scientists whose work has had a profound impact on the study of democracy and comparative politics. A comparative exploration by arend lijphart september 10, 1977. Books by arend lijphart author of patterns of democracy. Pluralism and democracy in the netherlands 4 which he later developed in his second book democracy in plural societies. This chapter contrasts the classic consociationalism of arend lijphart with the revisionist consociationalism of john mcgarry and brendan oleary. It is an indispensable work for all students of democracy and comparative politics, in part because it provides a frank and fascinating portrait of how the concepts, theory, and empirical research.
Arend lijpharts 1969 article on consociational democracy was a compelling critique of prevailing theories of democratic stability and the launching pad for one of the most widely regarded. A comparative exploration by arend lijphart september 10, 1977 arend lijphart on. The trajectory of the consociational research program, as inaugurated by arend lijphart s 1969 article in world politics, consociational democ. Illustration manual by the national commission on the parliamentary electoral law. Click download or read online button to consociationaldemocracyinmultiethnicsocieties book pdf for free now. Majority rule versus democracy in deeply divided societies. Evaluation of lijpharts model of consensus democracy. Arend lijphart s 1969 article on consociational democracy was a compelling critique of prevailing theories of democratic stability and the launching pad for one of the most widely regarded research programs in contemporary comparative politics. Uganda2, and in arthur lewiss 1965 work politics in west africa. Angloamerican political systems exemplified by britain and the united states, continental european political systems france, germany, and italy, and a third category consisting of.
Consociational democracy can be found in countries that are deeply divided into in particular by arend lijphart, and is used today as both an analytical and a. Arend lijphart s patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of democratic governance. Lijphart starts by differentiating between majoritarian and consensus democracy by asking the question who governs and in whose interest in cases of disagreement. A legislature elected by a simple majority of the voters governs, and voters throw the ruling party out if it. Edited volumes books and special issues of journals world politics. Lijphart, an optimist concerning the spread of democracy to the nations of the third world, sets forth in this wideranging study the theory of consociational democracy to accomplish that goal. American government in a thirtyonecountry perspective with steven l. Lijpharts definition of consociationalconsensus democracies from. Lijphart amended this topic so he could write on his usual theme, consociational powersharing democracy. He is the author or editor of more than a dozen books, with the two editions of his patterns. Consociationaldemocracyinmultiethnicsocieties download consociationaldemocracyinmultiethnicsocieties ebook pdf or read online books in pdf, epub, and mobi format.
Arend lijphart has 28 books on goodreads with 1762 ratings. The first, majoritarian or westminster democracy, is what most people immediate think of when they think of democracy. Pdf arend lijpharts 1969 article on consociational democracy was a compelling critique of. Arend lijphart, consociational democracy, world politics 21 january 1969.
Consensus democracy and the earlier concept of consociational democracy overlap considerably, but they differ in the degree to which they focus on formal institutions vs. In the late 1960s, arend lijphart proposed ethnicbased. Through the analysis of political systems in six continents, he demonstrates that what he calls consociational democracy can be successful in severely divided or plural societies. For me, it is the ideal system because it is the most capable of maximizing the level of representation given to the widest possible amount of the electorate.
A legislature elected by a simple majority of the voters governs, and voters throw the ruling party out if it governs poorly. Whereas examples of consociational democracies can be found all over the world, they developed in europe in particular. Comparative politics and the comparative method arend. Its four principal characteristics stand in sharp contrast with. According to huneeus 1985, spanish politics after the transition to democracy was consociational at the systemic. In todays world, the protection of individual rights in terms of negative liberty. Consociational parties and political accommodation in.
While his power sharing model has been widely criticized, it is also being adopted in countries as diverse as the netherlands, india, austria, south africa, and malaysia. If it available for your country it will shown as book reader and user fully. Lijphart, cons ociational democracy, world politics, vol 21, nr. Consociational democracy by arend lijphart summary extracts. Arend lijphart on sharing power in africa and the future. Patterns of democracy by arend lijphart waterstones. The basic purpose of the work is to explore the nature of consociational systems of government in stable western democracies and to investigate whether these provide a good blueprint that.
Types, cases, causes and consequences by arend lijphart introduction this article is an elaboration on the. Lijphart, lakatos, and consociationalism semantic scholar. Arend lijphart is best known for his theory of consociational or power sharing democracy, which enables the peaceful governance of deeply divided societies. These deviant cases of fragmented but stable democracies will be called consociational democracies. Introduction my ideal of democracy aligns closely to lijpharts model of consensus democracy, which i will be discussing at length in this essay. Almonds famous typology of political systems, first expounded in 1956, he distinguishes three types of western democratic systems.
In his book democracy in plural societies he is en. Project muse lijphart, lakatos, and consociationalism. Arend lijpharts patterns of democracy has become a standardized text within the comparative politics subfield, but i think the question needs to be asked given all the divergence in regime type that sprouted with the downfall of the soviet union, is the pure westminster system still a viable starting point for analyzing the points of. Table 1 the characteristics of majoritarian democracy, consensus democracy, and consociational democracy adapted from lijphart 1984a, 1989a. Pdf consociational democracy in theory and practice. In this updated and expanded edition of his classic text, arend lijphart offers a broader and deeper analysis of worldwide democratic institutions than ever before. Chapters 14 call our attention to two competing types of democracy. Lijphart, lakatos, and consociationalism world politics. The author is indebted to the institute of international studies, berkeley, for financial support. The concept of consociationalism was first advocated by lijphart in his workthe politics of accommodation.
1355 889 1534 102 943 307 1165 924 549 339 144 433 250 119 663 202 1548 367 672 843 147 312 568 1058 266 597 545 299 16 1007 1363